Педагогика

Електронно обучение

ADOPTION OF LMS MOODLE TOOLS IN STUDENT LEARNING – IN LINE WITH TEACHING PRACTICES

https://doi.org/10.53656/ped2022-8.04

Резюме. The education of students in an online-based environment in the conditions of a pandemic leads to an intensification of the use of Learning Management Systems (LMS) by higher education institutions (HEIs). In the study, a survey of the higher schools in Bulgaria, educating students mainly in the field of social, economic, and legal sciences, was made. Based on a survey of a sample of 14 universities that educate more than 1000 students in the specified field, it was found that over 92% of them use the Moodle e-platform. The results of a survey of the opinion of distance learning lecturers at University of Economics – Varna (UE – Varna) for the last three academic years allows for a detailed analysis of the use of Moodle tools and the identification of certain trends caused by the COVID-19 pandemic: coincidence in the five most used by teachers instruments for the three years of the period; some tools have been removed due to low usage, while others have seen an increase in usability (uploading multimedia presentations, URL module and electronic tests), some gamification-related tools have been added that are considered to have good potential for increasing students' motivation and engagement in learning.

Ключови думи: LMS; Moodle tools; gamification; interactive content; COVID-19 pandemic

Introduction

Effective student learning in higher education institutions in recent years has been inextricably linked to the use of Learning Management Systems. Their application contributes to the expansion of the digitization of teaching and learning in the higher education institutes. The propensity of the students themselves, in accordance with their age and preferences, to actively apply information technologies in all activities, leads to a clearly expressed positive attitude towards the digitization of educational activities.

The global impact of COVID-19 on learning at all levels of education, incl. higher education, led to changes in traditional teaching methods. As a result of the pandemic, the intensity of use of LMS has increased significantly in the last two years. The specified features outline new trends and give reason to conduct a study on the use of LMS in HEIs in Bulgaria, highlighting the changes that occur in the digitization of education in the context of the impact of the pandemic and outlining the main tools that are applied by perspective of teachers.

These are also the motives that determine the main objective of the research: to study the use of LMS in HEIs in Bulgaria, educating students in the field of social, economic, and legal sciences, as well as to examine the tools applied in the e-learning platform used in University of Economics – Varna (UE – Varna) from the teachers’ point of view. Similarly included in the scope of the study is the objective to track the change in tools use that is conditioned by the transition to fully electronic-based learning in an online environment caused by the pandemic situation.

The first section of the paper presents the results of a comprehensive study on what LMSs are used in HEIs in Bulgaria, which have an orientation towards educating students in the field of social, economic, and legal sciences. The second section presents the study design, and the third section is dedicated to the study of the main tools of the e-learning platform, which are applied by the teachers, using as a basis the practices of UE–Varna in distance learning. Specifics are highlighted in the tools applied before and during the pandemic, when the training is implemented in an electronic environment. The fourth section outlines guidelines that could be considered for educators to achieve greater engagement in their students. The conclusion summarizes the results achieved in the study and gives directions for future research.

Application of LMSs in education in HEIs in Bulgaria

The impact of information technologies on the learning process is particularly tangible. When studying their influence, researchers express the opinion that in the conditions of an open and increasingly globalized society, in which the dynamics of distribution and access to information are increasing, it is difficult to use it in the traditional way (Remali, Ghazali, Kamaruddin and Kee 2013; Indreica 2014). On this basis, the importance of e-learning platforms in higher education has grown significantly in recent years. By creating web-based adaptive collaborative learning environments they support face to face teaching and learning activities (Bentaa et al. 2015). They fully support the activities and learning of the students in the learning process - through the electronic platforms, the students access the digital educational content, take tests for self-preparation as well as for evaluation, upload distinct types of assignments, get access to video lectures and multimedia presentations, links to external sources, etc. Researchers emphasize the fact that e-learning platforms represent a tool for self-learning and thus achieve an important change in the use of resources, as well as enhance learning efficiency (Virtié 2012). Some authors highlight the benefits of using LMS in various areas – through them, learners and trainers can access the learning content anytime and anywhere. The e-platform centralizes all learning resources and activities, tools are available for tracking and reporting the success rate of students, an increase in the effectiveness of student activity is achieved, communication between learners and trainers is intensified and tools for learning analytics are available (Ghilay 2019). Other authors specifically emphasize that LMSs lead to a meaningful change in the learning experience for both students and faculty (Alexe et al. 2021), including in context of mobile learning (Todoranova and Penchev 2021).

Under the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the normal functioning of universities has been hindered and a transition to working in a fully online environment has been reached. Several authors maintain the opinion that, under these conditions, effective learning in a remote, electronically based environment becomes a key issue in the student learning process (Alturki and Aldraiweesh 2021; Sarnou and Sarnou 2021; Bakhmat, Babakina and Belmaz 2021; Polhun et al. 2021). On this basis, the increased application of two main tools in learning - on the one hand, e-learning and LMS platforms, and on the other hand, various video conferencing and online collaboration tools, such as Zoom and Microsoft Teams – became particularly important. Educational organizations all over the world, including in Bulgaria, have switched to actively using LMS in student training. Although this is a practice adopted by them long before the worsening of the epidemic situation related to COVID-19, the pandemic significantly contributed to the great intensification of the processes of digitalization of learning in higher schools.

The practical research in the present paper is based on the practices in the distance learning of students at the University of Economics - Varna. The university educates students in four professional areas: 3.7 Administration and Management; 3.8 Economics; 3.9 Tourism and 4.6 Computer Science. The first three directions refer to area of higher education 3. Social, Business and Legal Sciences, and the fourth belongs to area 4. Natural sciences, mathematics and informatics (Earth sciences, Mathematics and Informatics).

According to data from the official Register on the number of students in higher education institutions in Bulgaria, maintained by the Ministry of Education and Science (MES)1 as of May 2022, 75% of all public and private universities in the country educate students and doctoral students in area 3. Social, economic, and legal sciences. UE–Varna falls into this group, and the students from area 3. form 92.40% of all students, and for the distance form of education, the share is 100%. This fact gives us reason to direct our attention to the study of LMS usage practices in Bulgarian higher education institutions that educate students specifically in the field of social, economic, and legal sciences, as well as to base our conclusions and recommendations on the practices implemented in the distance form of education at UE–Varna.

There are three main research questions that are the subject of research in the publication:

RQ1: What are the LMSs that are mainly applied in the practice of universities educating students in area 3. Social, economic, and legal sciences?

RQ2: What are the main tools of the e-learning platform that are used by lecturers in the process of teaching students at the University of Economics - Varna?

RQ3: Is there a change in platform tools used during the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period?

Research Design

As we indicated, in this research we have set ourselves the goal of studying the application of LMS in a representative part of the higher schools in Bulgaria, teaching students mainly in the field of Social, Business and Legal Sciences. In order to identify these universities, a comprehensive study of all 52 accredited higher education institutions in the Republic of Bulgaria was carried out. The study is based on the Register of HEIs in Republic of Bulgaria2, maintained by the MES, and as of May 2022, it includes information on both state and private higher education institutions in the country. The studies show that in thirty-nine universities, students (including doctoral students) are educated in area 3. and they represent 31.55% of all students in the country. Table 1 presents summary information about the indicated higher schools, and their arrangement is based on the number of students from area 3. The data is current for the summer semester of the academic year 2021/2022.

Table 1. HEIs in Bulgaria teaching in the field 3. Social, Business and Legal Sciences

Name of the HEINumberof students2021/2022Numberof studentsin area 3.Share ofstudentsin area 3.Funding /Resources1University of National and World Economy17 70217 702100.00%State2Soa University “St. Kliment Ohridski“21 3597 46535.00%State3University of Economics – Varna6 2315 75792.40%State4Plovdiv university “Paisii Hilendarski“17 7074 93527.90%State5Varna Free University8 5904 48652.22%Private6New Bulgarian University94884 04642.64%Private7D.A. TsenovAcademy of Economics3 8153 815100.00%State8Univerisy ofAgrobusiness and Rural Development3 6553 655100.00%Private9St. Cyril and St. Methodius University of VelikoTurnovo10 1843 40533.43%State10South-West University “Neot Rilski”8 7563 28037.50%State11VUZF University1 5831 583100.00%Private
Name of the HEINumberof students2021/2022Numberof studentsin area 3.Share ofstudentsin area 3.Funding /Resources12International Business School1 2801 280100.00%Private13Burgas Free University2 4451 24650.96%Private14University of Library Studies and InformationTechnologies Soa3 7891 15630.51%State15University of Ruse6 20493915.14%State16University “Prof. Dr.Assen Zlatarov” Burgas366993425.50%State17MT&M College764764100%Private18Agriculture University Plovdiv3 25675323.21%State19Trakia University7 5397149.47%State20American University in Bulgaria1 18652844.52%Private21University of Security and Economics – Plovdiv1 79452129.04%Private22College of Tourism – Blagoevgrad493493100%Private23Technical University of Gabrovo3 49747813.7%State24Shumen University6 2964697.45%State25University of Food Technologies – Plovdiv3 91446211.80%State26UTP188539420.9%State27Varna University of Management42938589.74%Private28Todor Kableshkov University ofTransport1 50624116.00%State29Technical University of Soa10 5382322.20%State30Technical University of Varna5 0912244.40%State31“Vasil Levski” National Military University2 1751989.10%State32MOIAcademy1 6231499.18%State33University of Forestry2 8511485.19%State34Rakovski National Defence College1 4841288.63%State35Medical University – Varna “Prof. Dr. ParaskevStoyanov”6 238200.30%State36University of Chemical Technology and Metallurgy2 076170.82%State37Medical University - Pleven3 266110.30%State38Nikola Vaptsarov NavalAcademy3 18070.22%State39University of Mining and Geology “St. Ivan Rilski”2 91720.07%State

In order to focus the present research, the following criterion was chosen – the number of students trained in area 3. should be over 1 000 people. As a result of the application of the criterion, the investigated universities were reduced to a total of fourteen and are presented in table 2. Of these, eight HEIs are state and six are private. For all the universities included in the sample, a survey was made on their websites which LMS they use. Table 2. lists also the names of the systems and their URLs.

Table 2. HEI in area 3. with over 1 000 students and LMS they use

Name of the HEIFunding /ResourcesName of theused LMSURL address of the used system1University of National andWorld EconomyStateMoodlehttps://m-learning.unwe.bg/http://moodle.unwe.bg2Soa University “St.Kliment Ohridski“StateMoodlehttp://elearn.uni-soa.bg3University of Economics– VarnaStateMoodlehttp://e-learn.ue-varna.bg/4Plovdiv university “PaisiiHilendarski“StateMoodlehttps://e-learning.uni-plovdiv.bg/5Varna Free UniversityPrivateMoodlehttps://do.vfu.bg/6New Bulgarian UniversityPrivateMoodlehttps://e-edu.nbu.bg/7D.A. TsenovAcademy ofEconomicsStateMoodlehttps://dl.uni-svishtov.bg/8University ofAgrobusiness and RuralDevelopmentPrivateMoodlehttps://uni.e-uard.bg/http://www.vuarr-dist.com/index.php/9St. Cyril and St.Methodius University ofVeliko TurnovoStateMoodlehttps://deo.uni-vt.bg/10South-West University“Neot Rilski”StateMoodlehttp://www.e-learning.swu.bg/11VUZF UniversityPrivateMoodlehttps://moodle.vuzf.bg/12International BusinessSchoolPrivateMoodlehttps://dlc.ibsedu.bg/login/index.phphttps://students.ibsedu.bg/13Burgas Free UniversityPrivateMoodlehttps://moodle.bfu.bg/14University of LibraryStudies and InformationTechnologies SoaStateSystem“IntegratedLearningInformationArbeit System“(ILIAS)https://e-learn.unibit.bg/

The analysis of the data in Table 2. shows the following: 92.30% of the surveyed universities use the LMS Moodle. Only one university (with a share of only 7.1%) has focused on using another platform (ILIAS). This high relative share testifies to the leading positions that the Moodle e-learning platform has in Bulgaria among HEIs teaching in area 3. This gives us a serious reason, based on a study of the practice of UE–Varna in the use of Moodle tools, to make summaries that can be taken as a starting point for analyzing the practices of HEI's in Bulgaria.

In order to answer the research questions, the results of the annual surveys of lecturers’ opinions about the organization of distance learning and improvement of the quality of the offered educational service, conducted jointly by the Center for Electronic and Distance Learning and the Center for Quality of Learning at UE – Varna. A three-year period has been selected, covering the academic years before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: 2018/2019, 2019/2020 and 2020/2021. The surveys were conducted through the UE–Varna online survey system. The invitation to participate has been sent to all lecturers participating in distance education at the university. Table 3. presents the exact periods in which the data were collected, the number of teachers to whom an invitation to participate was sent, and the number of teachers who took part in the survey.

Table 3. Survey data by academic year

Indicator2018/20192019/20202020/2021Conducting period01.07.2019 –28.07.201907.07.2020 –02.08.202013.07.2021 –08.08.2021Number of surveys sent10783118Number of respondents524254Share of respondents48.60%50.60%45.76%

The method of forming the sample is according to those who responded, and the proportion of participants ranges between 46% (2020/2021) and 51% (2019/2020). The survey includes questions divided into 5 sections. A series of questions refer to each teacher's assessment of the degree of use of the e-learning platform tools, with a total of 26 tools described. Over the three academic years, there was some variation in the tools included in the surveys, with their number being 23 per year. For each tool, teachers can indicate to what extent they use it and the possible answers are the following: „I use it in all my disciplines“, „I use it in some of my disciplines“, „I don't use it, but I might in the future“, „I don't use it and I don't intend to”, „Not familiar with the tool”, „No answer”.

A study of the implemented tools in the Moodle platform in the context of distance learning in UE – Varna from the lecturers’ perspective

Particularly interesting from a research point of view is the question of which tools in the e-learning platform are used to the greatest extent by lecturers in the process of teaching students. In addition, the changes that have occurred in the scope of the most applied tools of the platform in the conditions of a pandemic situation and an online-based learning process are also of particular interest.

In order to analyze the tools used on the Moodle platform and draw relevant conclusions, Table 4 summarizes the results based on surveys of lecturers' opinions from the three academic years. The table summarizes the data on the tools used on the electronic platform in education of the distance learning students, with the numbers showing the total share of two of the answers “I use it in all my disciplines” and “I use it in some of my disciplines”. The ranking of the tools is based on responses to their use in the first year of the covered period.

In addition, it should be pointed out that during the COVID-19 pandemic situation and teaching in an online-based environment at UE–Varna, for the purposes of synchronous learning of students, the Google Meet video conferencing software is applied. It implements functionality similar to Moodle's open-source web conferencing plugin BigBlueButton (BBB) to support real-time online classrooms.

Table 4. Used Moodle tools by academic year

Tool2018/20192019/20202020/2021Upload Word and PDF les98.07%100.00%100.00%Assignments86.54%92.85%92.16%Using chat84.62%92.86%-Use of electronic tests78.84%92.85%98.04%URLModule (Hyperlinks)75.00%90.47%96.08%Upload multimedia presentations63.47%78.57%90.20%Create a forum61.54%76.19%66.67%Create a schedule48.07%35.71%21.57%Ask a general question44.23%59.52%43.14%Add les in specic formats38.46%59.52%50.98%Set labels25.00%45.24%31.37%Create a database25.00%30.96%27.45%Upload a video lecture / training lm25.00%38.09%33.34%Module “Lesson”23.08%35.72%33.34%Create a dictionary23.07%23.81%9.80%Development of surveys23.07%33.33%29.41%Online blog21.15%26.19%11.76%Module “Book”21.15%21.42%9.80%Creating a Wiki11.54%4.76%0.00%Using an IMS package11.54%7.14%-Creation of an Internet page11.54%19.05%13.73%Module “Workshop”9.62%9.52%7.84%Using a SCORM package5.77%4.76%-Module Game--3.92%H5P interactive content--1.96%Gamication QUESTOURnament--0.00%

Following the research questions posed, it is appropriate to analyze the information in Table 4 in the following aspects:

– Most and least used tools by lecturers during the study period

The five tools most used by teachers in the e-learning platform are the same for all three years of the period, and these are the traditional activities and resources of the platform for student learning, through which materials for (self) preparation are provided and assessment is carried out learners: uploading Word and PDF files, setting assignments, using chat, using e-tests, URL module (hyperlinks). Only one exception should be noted in the last year, when uploading multimedia presentations is included in the group of the most frequently used tools. The reason is objective, since the “Chat” function of the platform was then removed due to the inclusion in the training process of Google meet video conferencing software.

It is noteworthy that the intensity of use of the first five tools in the two last years of the period is different – it significantly increases and reaches over 90% among all respondents, while in the first year only one tool (file upload) is used by over 90% of them. The last year has seen a change in the ranking of the tools compared to the previous two, with the use of e-tests and hyperlinks taking the lead after the File Upload tool. The specified specifics are due to the accumulation of more skills in using the platform's resources and activities because of the continuous work of educators in an online environment caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Teachers need to be stimulated, including trained, to develop digital educational content and actively apply ICT in the learning process.

The five least used tools in the first two years of the period (although with different ranking) were creating a Wiki, using an IMS standard package, creating a Web page, the Workshop module, using a SCORM package. They are less applicable in teaching students of social sciences, economics, and law. Therefore, a very small proportion of teachers include them in their work. Only the creation of a website has a positive change in the intensity of its use compared to the beginning of the period.

– Dropped and added instruments within the study period

As already stated, although chat is in the top 5 most used tools, in the last year it has been removed as synchronous communication is done through the chat of the video conferencing software. In addition, asynchronous communication takes place through the messaging system of the e-learning platform. The most significant are the changes that occur in the little-used tools. In the third year of the period, two of them were removed (using a package according to the IMS standard and using a SCORM package) and three new ones were added: module Game, H5P interactive content, QUESTOURnament gamification. The new tools are extremely up-to-date and directly related to the new trends in the digitization of the educational process. They are still insufficiently known to teachers, which is why it is necessary to organize trainings for their application.

Tools that have undergone significant changes in terms of the intensity of their use during the study period

Three categories of tools stand out:

Tools with a clear trend of increasing their application. An increasing number of teachers during the analyzed period use uploading of multimedia presentations (42.1% growth compared to the beginning of the period), URL module (28.1% growth), use of electronic tests (24.4% growth), setting assignments (during the last year is 6.5% more compared to the beginning of the period), file uploads (2% growth and reaching 100% usage). The apparently positive trend covers the most frequently used resources and activities for the presentation of digital educational content by educators, which the Moodle platform provides.

Tools where there are fluctuations in the dynamics of their use, but at the end of the period their application is greater compared to the beginning (ranking is by growth in use of the tool at the end of the period compared to the beginning): module “Lesson” (up 44.5%), upload a video lecture/tutorial (up 33.4%), add files in specific formats (up 32.6%), develop surveys (up 27.5 %), set label (25% growth), website creation (19% growth), database creation (9.8% growth), forum creation (8.3% growth). The increased interest of teachers in diversifying the forms of digitalization of the learning process and targeting resources and activities that are time-consuming such as preparation and use, but through them the interactivity of the learning process, is striking.

Tools with a pronounced tendency to decrease in their use: the application of “Create a schedule” decreased by 55.1% compared to the beginning of the period, there is also a decrease in the module “Workshop” (decrease by 18.5%), and in the tool “Create a Wiki” the decline leads to a lack of application in the last year. The use of other tools such as creating a dictionary (decrease by 57.5% compared to the beginning of the period), module “Book” (decrease by 53.7%), online blog (decrease by 44.4%), setting general question (down 2.5%). It is necessary to track the effectiveness of the use of the indicated tools in the education of students in the field of social, economic, and legal sciences, to direct the attention of educators to them as well or to remove them and replace them with new ones.

Guidelines for Improving LMS Applicability in Learning

Learning management systems and specifically the Moodle platform are very suitable for use in the preparation of students in the field of social, economic, and legal sciences, which is the reason for their wide application in HEIs in Bulgaria. The analyzes made and the answers to the posed research questions provide grounds for formulating the following guidelines for improving their use:

1. Increasing the interactivity of learning to motivate students for more active participation. Lecturers use a wide variety of resources and activities on the Moodle platform in the learning process. The engagement of learners is directly related to the interactivity of the tools used. The implementation of two-way or multiway communication during the performance of a task for assessment, holding a discussion (forum), as well as in the process of self-training through the modules “Lesson”, “Book”, “Workshop”, etc. it stimulates students' engagement in solving various problems, develops critical thinking on the questions posed, and teachers get the oppor tunity to guide and evaluate them at the same time. In this way, a harmonious effect is achieved, which is characteristic of interactive action. It should be emphasized that the interaction requires very good preliminary preparation, because it must be adapted both to the available techniques and technologies, and to the available teaching time. The flexibility of the learning process can be improved by more intensive use of video conferencing software in traditional lear ning as well. Other authors also appreciate the importance of interactivity in learning and the relationship with student motivation (Skibińska and Kwiatkowska 2019; Gopinathan, S. et al. 2022).

2. Gamification of the learning process and creating more opportunities for students to express themselves. One of the ways to increase students' motivation and engagement is using gamification, providing an opportunity to include game elements in the educational process. The inclusion of game principles is possible both in learning platforms and in entertainment systems (Bankov 2020). Through the games teachers can set various incentives (bonuses) to activate students' work in a competitive environment with their colleagues. Several options are available on the e-learning platform to include games in the courses: “Madhouse”, “Snakes and Ladders”, “Cryptogram”, “Crossword”, “Hidden Picture”, “Get Rich”, “Sudoku” and others. We believe that in this way the effectiveness of the training will be increased, and the achieved results will be improved, which gives us reason to recommend the inclusion of interactive games in the training of students from the field of social, economic, and legal sciences.

3. Encouraging educators to create digital educational content. The digitization of education is related to the investment of serious personal efforts by teachers, which should be rewarded. The possibilities for this are different – financial stimulation, change in the load standards for active use of an e-learning platform, creation of conditions for the development and publication of teaching aids with interactive educational content, etc. The initial resistance of learners and trainers to the digitization of the educational process was completely overcome in the pandemic conditions. Currently, support (including through training) and stimulation by the management of higher schools is needed for more and more active application of ICT in education.

Conclusion

The use of LMS in HEIs is increasingly expanding, and in the context of a pandemic situation, this trend is intensifying. As a result of the research in this paper, it was established that the Bulgarian educational institutions, oriented to training students in the field of social, economic, and legal sciences, mainly use the Moodle e-learning platform in their education. The study shows that 92.30% of the 14 higher education institutions included in the study with more than 1000 students rely on this platform.

The study of the main tools of the e-learning platform Moodle from lecturers’ point of view is based on surveys among distance learning trainers at UE–Varna for three academic years, including a period before and during the pandemic. The study found the following results:

1. There is overlap in the five most used e-platform tools by educators, including traditional student learning activities and resources: file uploads, assignments, chat, e-tests, URL module (hyperlinks). Last year uploading multimedia presentations replaces the chat tool, because the video conferencing tool Google meet is included as the fifth leading tool. During the COVID-19 period their use is markedly increasing. The least used tools are creating a Wiki, using an IMS standard package, creating a Web page, the Workshop module, using a SCORM package.

2. Some tools have been identified that have been removed due to their low use (using a package according to the IMS standard and using a SCORM package), as well as particularly relevant tools such as module Game, H5P interactive content, QUESTOURnament gamification have been included.

3. Tools with a clear tendency to increase in their usability are presented (uploading multimedia presentations, URL module and electronic tests); with other tools, there are fluctuations in their use, but at the end of the period they show a serious growth (e.g. “Lesson” module, uploading a video lecture/educational film, adding files in specific formats, etc.). In the case of a third group of tools, a contraction in their use is noticeable (Creating a timetable, the “Workshop” module, “Creating a Wiki”, etc.).

Based on the analyzes made and in response to the research questions, some recommendations are formulated to improve the usability of the LMS: it is necessary to expand the interactivity of the training in order to increase the motivation of the students. as well as to actively include gamification in the learning process so that learners are more engaged in learning. It is recommended that lecturers are encouraged to intensively prepare and upload rich digital educational content to the e-platform so that students can be more fully involved in learning. This is a direction for future research by the authors.

NOTES

1. Ministry of education and science (MES) 2022. Register of number of current students and doctoral students by educational and qualification degree and specialty https://stats.mon.bg/Reports/Index/745a6b79-dd8a-4008-846a486015f9fa8b

2. Ministry of education and science (MES) 2022. Register of Higher Education Institutions. http://rvu.mon.bg/HomeEn/IndexEn

3. Alexe, C.-M., Alexe, C.-G., Dumitriu, D. & Mustață, I.C., 2021. The Analysis of the Users’ Perceptions Regarding the Learning Management Systems for Higher Education: Case Study Moodle. Proc. of the 17th International Scientific Conference on eLearning and Software for Education, eLSE 2021, 22-23 April 2021, 284-293. DOI: 10.12753/2066-026X-21-104.

4. Virtié, M.P., 2012. the role of internet in education. in: capay, m., mesarosova, m., palmarova, v. divai 2012, 9th International Scientific Conference on Distance Learning in Applied Informatics, Slovakia, 243-249.

REFERENCES

ALTURKI, U. & ALDRAIWEESH, A., 2021. Application of Learning Management System (LMS) during the COVID-19 Pandemic: ASustainable Acceptance Model of the Expansion Technology Approach. Sustainability [Online] 13, 10991, 1 – 16. Available from DOI: 10.3390/ su131910991.

BAKHMAT, L., BABAKINA, O. & BELMAZ, Y., 2021. Assessing online education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of lecturers in Ukraine. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840.

BANKOV, B., 2020. Game Design Principles in Enterprise Web Applications. Informatics, Geoinformatics and Remote Sensing, 2(1), 161 – 167.

BENTAA, D., BOLOGAA, G., DZITACAB, S. & DZITAC I., 2015. University Level Learning and Teaching via E-Learning Platforms. Procedia Computer Science, 55, 1366 – 1373.

GHILAY, Y., 2019. Effectiveness of Learning Management Systems in Higher Education: Views of Lecturers with Different Levels of Activity in LMSs. Journal of Online Higher Education, 3(2), 29 – 48.

GOPINATHAN, S. et al., 2022. The Role of Digital Collaboration in Student Engagement towards Enhancing Student Participation during COVID-19. Sustainability [Online], 14(11), 6844, Available from DOI: 10.3390/su14116844.

INDREICA, S.E., 2014. E-Learning platform: advantages and disadvantages on time management. Bucuresti: Carol I National Defence University Publishing House.

POLHUN, K., KRAMARENKO, T., MALOIVAN, M. & TOMILINA, A., 2021. Shift from blended learning to distance one during the lockdown period using Moodle: test control of students’ academic achievement and analysis of its results. Journal of Physics: Conference Series [Online] 1840, 012053, Available from DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012053.

REMALI, A.M., GHAZALI, M.A., KAMARUDDIN, M.K. & KEE, T.Y., 2013. Understanding Academic Performance Based on Demographic Factors, Motivation Factors and Learning Styles. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 3(9), 1938 – 1951.

SARNOU, H. & SARNOU, D., 2021. Investigating the EFL Courses Shift into Moodle during the Pandemic of COVID-19: The Case of MA Language and Communication at Mostaganem University. Arab World English Journal, 354 – 363.

SKIBIŃSKA, M. & KWIATKOWSKA, W., 2019. Interactivity of elearning and the motivation of learners. In: J. Beseda, L. Rohlikova, V. Duffec, (Eds.). Proc. of 14th Conference on E-Learning - Unlocking the Gate to Education around the Globe, Microsoft. Prague, 320 – 336.

TODORANOVA, L. & PENCHEV, B., 2021. Perspectives for Mobile Learning in Higher Education in Bulgaria. In: T. Tagarev et al. Digital Transformation, Cyber Security and Resilience of Modern Societies. Cham: Springer International Publ., 441 – 445.

Година XCIV, 2022/8 Архив

стр. 1007 - 1020 Изтегли PDF